Opinions of the Court - 2021

Published Thursday, September 24, 1789

Major Court Decisions


NFIB V. OSHA 

Theed.

Question: Does the Constitutions?

Ruling (7-2): The previous courtsn.


BIDEN V. MISSOURI

The district attorney ofs. 

Question: Does the ?

Ruling (): The court.

UNITED STATES V. TEXAS

The Texas legislature passed a law, SB 8, that prohibits abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy. Additionally, the law criminalizes any person who "aids or abets" any such abortion and permits any private citizen (as opposed to the state itself), to file a lawsuit for damages against such persons. Abortion providers challenged the law, and the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the providers’ initial request to block enforcement of the law. After the law went into effect, the providers filed another legal challenge, as did the federal government. A federal district court temporarily enjoined enforcement of the law, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit stayed the lower court's injunction. The Department of Justice asked the Court to reinstate the district court's judgment.

Question: Did the federal government lawfully exempt religious objectors from the regulatory requirement to provide health plans that include contraceptive coverage?
Ruling (7-2): In a per curiam decision, the court dismissed the case as improvidently granted and denied the application to vacate the stay.

WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH V. JACKSON

The Texas legislature passed a law, SB 8, that prohibits abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy. Additionally, the law criminalizes any person who "aids or abets" any such abortion and permits any private citizen (as opposed to the state itself), to file a lawsuit for damages against such persons. Abortion providers challenged the law, and the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the providers’ initial request to block enforcement of the law. After the law went into effect, the providers filed another legal challenge.

Question: Can the United States sue the State of Texas in federal court to prohibit enforcement of an unconstitutional abortion law?

Ruling: The petitioners in this case may proceed past the motion-to-dismiss stage only as to the defendants who are state medical licensing officials.  


Other Cases

MCCARTHY v. PELOSI (House Proxy Voting)

Whether the speech-and-debate clause forecloses judicial review of the constitutionality of the proxy voting resolution in this action against the speaker of the house, the clerk and the sergeant-at-arms; and (2) whether the U.S. House of Representatives resolution allowing members to cast floor votes by proxy is unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court on declined to hear House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s challenge to House proxy voting rules, which were proposed by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) in 2020 in response to the coronavirus pandemic. The Supreme Court, as is typical, did not comment on why it declined to hear McCarthy’s case.

Together Employees v. Mass General

Brigham Hospital Workers Rejected at Supreme Court on Vaccine Mandate A U.S. Supreme Court justice turned away a request from eight Mass General Brigham Inc. workers for a religious exemption from the Massachusetts hospital system’s requirement that they be vaccinated against Covid-19. The workers, who say they have already been fired from their jobs, contended the mandatory vaccine policy violates federal job-discrimination and disabilities law.




All Cases

January 2021
December 2021

November 2021

October 2021




National Write Your Congressman
2435 N. Central Expressway, Ste. 300
Richardson, Texas 75080
Phone: (214) 342-0299
Copyright © 2025 National Write Your Congressman